<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tech Side of ME &#187; Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techsideofme.com/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techsideofme.com</link>
	<description>Rants of a goddamned nerd, over-twisted geek, cycling on event horizon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:21:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cross browser font rendering comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.techsideofme.com/2009/12/22/cross-browser-font-rendering-comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techsideofme.com/2009/12/22/cross-browser-font-rendering-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Debsuvra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Wide Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Font]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techsideofme.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When designing a website, apart from the usual gradients and other graphical elements, the single most important constituent is the Font. It takes a hell lot of trial and error to get the right font for your website, you need &#8230; <a href="http://www.techsideofme.com/2009/12/22/cross-browser-font-rendering-comparison/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>When designing a website, apart from the usual gradients and other graphical elements, the single most important constituent is the Font. It takes a hell lot of trial and error to get the right font for your website, you need to try different ones, look at them from different angles and decide if they’ll work for you or not. On the other hand, since the browsers will be finally rendering whatever you’ve chosen as your favourite, a designer also has to keep in mind how different browsers are generating the fonts according to the underlying code. That’s why I decided to give the 3 most popular browsers a go on their own capabilities of font rendition. And here’s the result,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techsideofme.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Font-rendering-comparison.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-91" title="Font rendering comparison" src="http://www.techsideofme.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Font-rendering-comparison.png" alt="Font rendering comparison" width="677" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>As you can see, Google Chrome 4 Dev builds have some problems with Font Anti-Aliasing, while IE shows a bit more blur than anyone else. In my opinion Firefox 3.6 Beta 5 gave the best results with both Serif and Sans-Serif fonts.<span id="more-90"></span></p>
<p><strong>Browsers used: </strong><em>Firefox 3.6 Beta 5, Google Chrome Dev Build 4.0.266.0, Internet Explorer 8</em></p>
<p><strong>OS:</strong><em> Windows 7 (64 bit), Cleartype ON</em></p>
<p><strong>Fonts used:</strong> <em>Arial (Sans-Serif) and Georgia (Serif)</em></p>
<p>P.S. I don&#8217;t have Photoshop installed currently in my PC, that&#8217;s why the graphics presented here is rather &#8216;basic&#8217;. Had to do with Paint.NET and don&#8217;t know much tricks on it.</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-90"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.techsideofme.com%2F2009%2F12%2F22%2Fcross-browser-font-rendering-comparison%2F' data-shr_title='Cross+browser+font+rendering+comparison'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='true' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.techsideofme.com%2F2009%2F12%2F22%2Fcross-browser-font-rendering-comparison%2F' data-shr_title='Cross+browser+font+rendering+comparison'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techsideofme.com/2009/12/22/cross-browser-font-rendering-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

